Blog

There’s a conversation I keep having with bankers lately, especially strong commercial lenders who’ve been around long enough to see how the industry has changed.

Most banks don’t really have a producer problem.

They have a development problem.

There are plenty of people who can survive in commercial banking. There are fewer who can actually develop younger lenders, coach teams, build culture, and create long-term production environments. That gap is getting more obvious every year.

I was talking with a banker recently who had just left traditional banking for a family office role. Very smart guy. Strong producer. Did serious volume. But the interesting part of the conversation wasn’t about production.

It was when he said:

“I enjoy the coaching aspect more than the ongoing slog of finding the next deal. It’s about building real bankers.”

Honestly, I’m hearing versions of that all the time now.

And it points to a bigger issue in banking right now: a lot of institutions spent years rewarding production without really developing leadership.

The result is a growing gap between people who can personally produce and people who can actually build strong commercial banking teams.

That’s becoming a real problem.

---

For years, commercial banking has rewarded individual performance above everything else. Grow loans, bring deposits, hit production goals, expand relationships. And to be fair, that matters. It always will.

But somewhere along the line, a lot of banks started assuming that great producers automatically become great leaders.

That’s usually not true.

Managing and developing lenders is an entirely different skill set than being a high-performing lender yourself.

The best commercial bankers are often independent, competitive, relationship-driven people. Those traits help them win business. But leadership requires patience, coaching ability, communication, accountability, and the ability to develop talent over time.

A lot of banks never trained for that transition.

So now you have organizations full of decent lenders, but very few true leaders.

---

The three biggest weaknesses I keep hearing about are credit training, business development coaching, and leadership bench strength.

Credit training has quietly eroded in a lot of places.

Younger lenders know how to move things through systems. Many can sell. But fewer truly understand credit the way older commercial bankers were forced to learn it. Part of that is generational turnover, part of it is remote environments, part of it is growth pressure, and part of it is banks trying to scale quickly.

Experienced bankers notice it immediately. A lot of institutional knowledge walked out the door over the last several years, and some banks are still struggling to replace it.

Then there’s business development coaching.

Most lenders get production expectations. Far fewer get actual coaching. There’s a real difference between telling someone to “go bring in business” and teaching them how strong commercial bankers actually build markets, referral networks, COI relationships, and long-term trust. A lot of managers were never formally taught that themselves, so coaching becomes surface-level activity management instead of real development.

And then there’s leadership bench strength, which may be the biggest issue of all.

A surprising number of banks don’t have enough next-generation leaders ready to take over commercial teams. Not because there aren’t smart people, but because leadership development was never intentional. Now banks are dealing with aging leadership teams, pending retirements, succession gaps, high turnover, and younger lenders with limited management experience. The same handful of experienced leaders end up carrying everything.

---

The banks that are going to separate themselves over the next decade are the ones that figure this out early.

Not just “Who can produce today?” but “Who can build producers five years from now?”

That’s the real question.

Commercial banking is still a people business. The institutions that intentionally develop leaders, transfer knowledge, and build strong commercial cultures are going to have a significant advantage. And the people who can genuinely coach, develop, and elevate commercial talent are becoming increasingly valuable in this market.

If you’re seeing this gap at your institution, or if you’re one of those people who can actually build bankers, I’d love to hear what you’re experiencing. Feel free to connect or drop a comment below.